Civil online courts: A proposal to introduce them without affecting the right to access to justice of those that do not have access to the internet
Authors
-
José Allende Pérez de Arce
Allende Bascuñan y Cía.
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-3811
Abstract
One of the main concerns associated to the implementation of online civil courts is the situation of those persons that do not have access to the internet. In that sense, in this work we propose a formula to introduce such courts without affecting the right to access to justice of those that do not have access to the web. The idea is to find the adequate balance between this policy that have already proven its value in saving litigation time and costs, and the State’s duty to secure the right to access the courts of justice to all its citizens.Keywords:
Online courts, Access to justice, civil procedureReferences
Aylwin, Nicole y Martha Simmons (2017). «Innovation and access to justice: Addressing the challenge of a diverse justice ecosystem». The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 34 (1): i-vi. DOI: 10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4995.
Bailey, Jane, Jacquelyn Burkell y Graham Reynolds (2013). «Access to justice for all: Towards an «expansive vision» of justice and technology». The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 31 (2): 181-207. DOI: 10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419.
Brett, Jeanne, Mara Olekalns, Ray Friedman, Nathan Goates, Cameron Anderson y Cara Cherry Lisco (2007). «Sticks and stones: Language, face, and online dispute resolution». Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 85-99. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24161853.
Briggs, Michael (2016). «On the cusp of a civil revolution». The Annual Harbour Lecture. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2Rjm8Wl.
Browne-Wilkinson, Nicolas (1999). «The UK access to justice report: A sheep in Woolf’s clothing». Western Australian Law Review, 28 (1): 181-191. Disponible Hough, Bonnie (2012). «Let’s not make it worse: Issues to consider in adopting new technology». Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 26 (1): 256-257. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2KlTza1.
Cabral, James y Thomas Clarke (2012). «Access to justice integration with emerging court technologies: Using technology to enhance access to justice». Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 26 (1): 241-324. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2RjYuJc.
Domínguez, Juan Pablo (2007) «Reflexiones en torno a la propuesta de reforma al procedimiento civil chileno: 3. Principios procesales relativos al procedimiento». Revista Chilena de Derecho, 34 (3): 595-598. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-34372007000300015.
Dyson, Matthew y David Ibbetson (editores) (2013). Law and legal process: Substantive law and procedure in English legal history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139629140.
Etherton, Terence (2018) «Civil justice after Jackson». Conkerton Memorial Lecture. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2XLIeTT.
García, José Francisco y Francisco Javier Leturia (2006). «Justicia civil: Diagnóstico, evidencia empírica y lineamientos para una reforma». Revista Chilena de Derecho, 33 (2): 345-384. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-34372006000200008.
Genn, Hazel (1997). «Understanding Civil Justice». Current Legal Problems, 50 (1): 155-187. DOI: 10.1093/clp/50.1.155.
Genn, Hazel (2013). «What is Civil Justice for? Reform, ADR, and access to justice». Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 24 (1): 397-417. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2RgOpgn.
Harasic, Davor (2006). «Justicia civil: Transformación necesaria y urgente». En José Pedro Silva, Juan Francisco García y Francisco Javier Leturia (editores), Justicia civil y comercial: Una reforma pendiente. Santiago: Fundación Libertad y Desarrollo.
Hörnle, Julia (2009). Cross-border internet dispute resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576102.
Hough, Bonnie (2012). «Let’s not make it worse: Issues to consider in adopting new technology». Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 26 (1): 256-257.
Katsh, Ethan y Orna Rabinovich-Einy (2017). Online dispute resolution and access to justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pappas, Brian (2008). «Online court: Online dispute resolution and the future of small claims». UCLA Journal of Law & Technology, 12 (2): 1-25. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2RgOhNO.
Rabinovich-Einy, Orna y Ethan Katsh (2014). «Digital justice: Reshaping boundaries in an online dispute resolution environment». International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 1: 5-36. DOI: 10.5553/IJODR/2014001001002.
Raymond, Anjanette y Scott Schackeford (2014). «Technology, ethics, and access to justice: Should an algorithm be deciding your case?». Michigan Journal of International Law, 35 (3): 485-524. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2309052.
Riego, Cristián y Ricardo Lillo (2015). «¿Qué se ha dicho sobre el funcionamiento de la justicia civil en Chile? Aportes para la reforma». Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado, 25. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-80722015000200001.
Roberts, Simon (1993). «Alternative dispute resolution and Civil Justice: An unresolved relationship». Modern Law Review, 56 (3): 452-470. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02683.x.
Roberts, Simon y Michael Palmer (2005). Dispute processes: ADR and the primary forms of decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805295.
Ruhl, Giesela (2011). «Preparing Germany for the twenty-first century». En Russel Miller y Peer Zumbansen (editores), Comparative Law as transnational law: A decade of the German Law Journal. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795208.003.0035.
Sorabji, John (2014). English Civil Justice after the Woolf and Jackson reforms: A critical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107280113.
Susskind, Richard y Daniel Susskind (2015). The future of professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tavolari, Raúl (1992). «El proceso civil chileno: Una lectura desde el debido proceso y la eficacia de la jurisdicción de cara a la reforma». Revista Derecho y Humanidades, 2: 147-172. DOI: 10.5354/0719-2517.2012.25815.
Zuckerman, Adrian (editor) (1999). Civil justice in crisis: Comparative perspectives of civil procedure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298335.001.0001.
Zuckerman, Adrian (2015). Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice. 3.ª ed. Londres: Sweet & Maxwell.
Bailey, Jane, Jacquelyn Burkell y Graham Reynolds (2013). «Access to justice for all: Towards an «expansive vision» of justice and technology». The Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, 31 (2): 181-207. DOI: 10.22329/wyaj.v31i2.4419.
Brett, Jeanne, Mara Olekalns, Ray Friedman, Nathan Goates, Cameron Anderson y Cara Cherry Lisco (2007). «Sticks and stones: Language, face, and online dispute resolution». Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 85-99. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24161853.
Briggs, Michael (2016). «On the cusp of a civil revolution». The Annual Harbour Lecture. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2Rjm8Wl.
Browne-Wilkinson, Nicolas (1999). «The UK access to justice report: A sheep in Woolf’s clothing». Western Australian Law Review, 28 (1): 181-191. Disponible Hough, Bonnie (2012). «Let’s not make it worse: Issues to consider in adopting new technology». Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 26 (1): 256-257. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2KlTza1.
Cabral, James y Thomas Clarke (2012). «Access to justice integration with emerging court technologies: Using technology to enhance access to justice». Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 26 (1): 241-324. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2RjYuJc.
Domínguez, Juan Pablo (2007) «Reflexiones en torno a la propuesta de reforma al procedimiento civil chileno: 3. Principios procesales relativos al procedimiento». Revista Chilena de Derecho, 34 (3): 595-598. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-34372007000300015.
Dyson, Matthew y David Ibbetson (editores) (2013). Law and legal process: Substantive law and procedure in English legal history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139629140.
Etherton, Terence (2018) «Civil justice after Jackson». Conkerton Memorial Lecture. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2XLIeTT.
García, José Francisco y Francisco Javier Leturia (2006). «Justicia civil: Diagnóstico, evidencia empírica y lineamientos para una reforma». Revista Chilena de Derecho, 33 (2): 345-384. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-34372006000200008.
Genn, Hazel (1997). «Understanding Civil Justice». Current Legal Problems, 50 (1): 155-187. DOI: 10.1093/clp/50.1.155.
Genn, Hazel (2013). «What is Civil Justice for? Reform, ADR, and access to justice». Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 24 (1): 397-417. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2RgOpgn.
Harasic, Davor (2006). «Justicia civil: Transformación necesaria y urgente». En José Pedro Silva, Juan Francisco García y Francisco Javier Leturia (editores), Justicia civil y comercial: Una reforma pendiente. Santiago: Fundación Libertad y Desarrollo.
Hörnle, Julia (2009). Cross-border internet dispute resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511576102.
Hough, Bonnie (2012). «Let’s not make it worse: Issues to consider in adopting new technology». Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 26 (1): 256-257.
Katsh, Ethan y Orna Rabinovich-Einy (2017). Online dispute resolution and access to justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pappas, Brian (2008). «Online court: Online dispute resolution and the future of small claims». UCLA Journal of Law & Technology, 12 (2): 1-25. Disponible en http://bit.ly/2RgOhNO.
Rabinovich-Einy, Orna y Ethan Katsh (2014). «Digital justice: Reshaping boundaries in an online dispute resolution environment». International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution, 1: 5-36. DOI: 10.5553/IJODR/2014001001002.
Raymond, Anjanette y Scott Schackeford (2014). «Technology, ethics, and access to justice: Should an algorithm be deciding your case?». Michigan Journal of International Law, 35 (3): 485-524. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2309052.
Riego, Cristián y Ricardo Lillo (2015). «¿Qué se ha dicho sobre el funcionamiento de la justicia civil en Chile? Aportes para la reforma». Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado, 25. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-80722015000200001.
Roberts, Simon (1993). «Alternative dispute resolution and Civil Justice: An unresolved relationship». Modern Law Review, 56 (3): 452-470. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02683.x.
Roberts, Simon y Michael Palmer (2005). Dispute processes: ADR and the primary forms of decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805295.
Ruhl, Giesela (2011). «Preparing Germany for the twenty-first century». En Russel Miller y Peer Zumbansen (editores), Comparative Law as transnational law: A decade of the German Law Journal. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795208.003.0035.
Sorabji, John (2014). English Civil Justice after the Woolf and Jackson reforms: A critical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107280113.
Susskind, Richard y Daniel Susskind (2015). The future of professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tavolari, Raúl (1992). «El proceso civil chileno: Una lectura desde el debido proceso y la eficacia de la jurisdicción de cara a la reforma». Revista Derecho y Humanidades, 2: 147-172. DOI: 10.5354/0719-2517.2012.25815.
Zuckerman, Adrian (editor) (1999). Civil justice in crisis: Comparative perspectives of civil procedure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298335.001.0001.
Zuckerman, Adrian (2015). Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice. 3.ª ed. Londres: Sweet & Maxwell.
